by Shruti P | Apr 8, 2024 | Human Rights, Land & Freedom, Women Unions & Power
Trade unions in West Bengal including IUF affiliated Progressive Plantation Workersâ Union, Nowera Nuddy have been campaigning for housing rights for people in the tea plantations for many years. As a result, on 1st August 2023, the West Bengal government issued notification to grant âpattasâ (land for houses) to people living in tea plantations in the six districts in the North Bengal region under the âScheme for distributing homestead pattas among landless tea gardens labourers in North Bengalâ. The implementation of the notification started in February, 2024.
This is a historic victory for tea plantation workers and their families, who have been living on the same land for 4 generations but still had no rights to their homes. Workers houses are treated as a condition for their employment and is understood as a form of wage-in kind that justifies low wages, an instrument to control their lives.[1]
International human rights law recognizes everyoneâs right to an adequate standard of living, including adequate housing. Access to adequate housing can be a precondition for the enjoyment of several human rights, including the rights to work, health, social security, vote, privacy or education.[2] Not having right to their house and the constant threat of forced eviction interferes with workersâ ability to exercise their right to freedom of association and collective bargaining.
Women workers planning the implementation of housing rights
âWe have always had uncertainty about where we belong. We have lived in the company house since our forefathers but were made to feel like we are not from here. We live with a fear that we can be thrown out. We are always uncertain to make any changes to the house, as some company managers allow but some donâtâ said Sister Sabitri Lohar, Womenâs Water, Sanitation and Health Committee member at Nowera Nuddy tea estate.
Winning housing rights is significant as it provides security to people in the plantations, reduces vulnerability and a step away from plantation paternalism, where everything from clean drinking water to repairing toilets to healthcare and education is perceived as services and care provided by the management at the will of management. Workers didnât have decision making power regarding their lives and moreover they didnât have any certainty to plan their future.
What makes the victory even more significant is that the unions will be part of the official committees that will conduct survey and finalize beneficiaries, the house deed will also have womenâs name in it and in families with single or widow women, it will solely be in their name, family with only women head will be given priorities and the deed can only be heritable and cannot be transferred.
On March 10, 2024, the Womenâs Committee at Nowera Nuddy has taken a decision to conduct their own survey, mapping and work together with the responsible government officials to ensure that workers and their families get access to housing rights. Womenâs Committee is also running an education campaign to explain the details of the notification.
Women workers discussing the importance of housing rights in reducing vulnerability for women by using International Women’s Day 2024 posters.
âThis is a huge win for us and for our childrenâs future. If the house is in our name no one can ask us to leave. With this we can link with other government programs to build our houses. We can build it as our own home.â said Sister Kapila Lohar, Womenâs Womenâs Water, Sanitation and Health Committee member.
âWe have done surveys for access to water and sanitation in the housing lines, we know how many families live in each housing line. We will do a similar survey for houses and will accompany the government officials, so no oneâs name is left behind.â said Sister Parbait Lohar, Womenâs Womenâs Water, Sanitation and Health Committee member.
Womenâs Water, Sanitation and Health Committee won reinstatement for Sister Behani Oraon (on the right). Sis. Behani, a 45 years old widow, worked in the plantation for 25 years as a permanent worker was suspended for constructing her house.
Worker’s current housing condition
Worker’s current housing conditions
[1] In tea plantations, housing is provided by the management of the company, that has leased the plantation from the government, only to permanent workers, but when a permanent worker retires or dies, someone in the family has to replace them as permanent worker. This system is called âBadliâ work. So at least one member in the family must work as permanent worker in the plantation to keep living in that house or they will be threatened or forced to vacate the house. This system hinders in workers and their familyâs ability to access human rights.
[2] Office of the United Nations High Commissioner for Human Rights, The Right to Adequate Housing: https://www.ohchr.org/sites/default/files/Documents/Publications/FS21_rev_1_Housing_en.pdf
by IUF Asia/Pacific | Oct 22, 2023 | āĻŦāĻžāĻāĻ˛āĻž Bengali, Climate Justice, Land & Freedom, Social Justice
ā§§ā§Ŧ āĻ
āĻā§āĻā§āĻŦāĻ°, ā§¨ā§Ļā§¨ā§Š-āĻ āĻāĻŦā§āĻĻā§āĻ˛ āĻŽāĻāĻŋāĻĻ āĻāĻžāĻā§ā§āĻ° āĻŽā§āĻ¤ā§āĻ¯ā§āĻ¤ā§ āĻāĻļāĻŋā§āĻž-āĻĒā§āĻ¯āĻžāĻ¸āĻŋāĻĢāĻŋāĻ āĻ
āĻā§āĻāĻ˛ āĻā§ā§ā§, āĻāĻāĻāĻāĻāĻĢ āĻ¸āĻĻāĻ¸ā§āĻ¯āĻ°āĻž āĻāĻā§āĻ° āĻļā§āĻ āĻĒā§āĻ°āĻāĻžāĻļ āĻāĻ°ā§āĨ¤ āĻŽāĻāĻŋāĻĻ āĻāĻžāĻ āĻāĻŋāĻ˛ā§āĻ¨ āĻŦāĻžāĻāĻ˛āĻžāĻĻā§āĻļā§ āĻ°āĻžāĻˇā§āĻā§āĻ°ā§ā§ āĻŽāĻžāĻ˛āĻŋāĻāĻžāĻ¨āĻžāĻ§ā§āĻ¨ āĻā§āĻˇāĻŋ āĻĢāĻžāĻ°ā§āĻŽā§ āĻāĻ°ā§āĻŽāĻ°āĻ¤ āĻļā§āĻ°āĻŽāĻŋāĻāĻĻā§āĻ° āĻā§āĻ°ā§āĻĄ āĻāĻāĻ¨āĻŋā§āĻ¨āĻ¸āĻŽā§āĻšā§āĻ° āĻāĻāĻāĻŋ āĻāĻžāĻ¤ā§ā§ āĻĢā§āĻĄāĻžāĻ°ā§āĻļāĻ¨, āĻŦāĻžāĻāĻ˛āĻžāĻĻā§āĻļ āĻā§āĻˇāĻŋ āĻĢāĻžāĻ°ā§āĻŽ āĻļā§āĻ°āĻŽāĻŋāĻ āĻĢā§āĻĄāĻžāĻ°ā§āĻļāĻ¨ (āĻŦāĻŋāĻāĻāĻĢāĻāĻ˛āĻāĻĢ) āĻāĻ° āĻāĻāĻāĻ¨ āĻĒā§āĻ°āĻ¤āĻŋāĻˇā§āĻ āĻžāĻ¤āĻž āĻ¸āĻĻāĻ¸ā§āĻ¯ āĻāĻŦāĻ āĻ¸āĻāĻžāĻĒāĻ¤āĻŋāĨ¤ āĻŦāĻŋāĻāĻāĻĢāĻāĻ˛āĻāĻĢ āĻāĻļāĻŋā§āĻž-āĻĒā§āĻ¯āĻžāĻ¸āĻŋāĻĢāĻŋāĻ āĻ
āĻā§āĻāĻ˛ā§ āĻāĻāĻāĻāĻāĻĢ āĻāĻ° āĻ¸āĻŦāĻā§ā§ā§ āĻĒā§āĻ°āĻžāĻ¨ā§ āĻ¸āĻĻāĻ¸ā§āĻ¯ āĻāĻāĻ¨āĻŋā§āĻ¨ā§āĻ° āĻŽāĻ§ā§āĻ¯ā§ āĻāĻāĻāĻŋāĨ¤
āĻŽāĻāĻŋāĻĻ āĻāĻžāĻ ā§§ā§¯ā§ā§Ž āĻ¸āĻžāĻ˛ā§ āĻŦāĻŋāĻāĻāĻĢāĻāĻ˛āĻāĻĢ āĻāĻ āĻ¨ āĻāĻ°ā§āĻ¨, āĻ¯āĻžāĻ° āĻ˛āĻā§āĻˇā§āĻ¯ āĻāĻŋāĻ˛ āĻā§āĻˇā§āĻĻā§āĻ° āĻ āĻĒā§āĻ°āĻžāĻ¨ā§āĻ¤āĻŋāĻ āĻā§āĻˇāĻ, āĻĢāĻžāĻ°ā§āĻŽ āĻļā§āĻ°āĻŽāĻŋāĻ āĻāĻŦāĻ āĻĻā§āĻ¨āĻŋāĻ āĻŽāĻā§āĻ°āĻŋāĻāĻŋāĻ¤ā§āĻ¤āĻŋāĻ āĻā§āĻˇāĻŋ āĻļā§āĻ°āĻŽāĻŋāĻāĻĻā§āĻ° āĻ
āĻ§āĻŋāĻāĻžāĻ° āĻ āĻ¸ā§āĻŦāĻžāĻ°ā§āĻĨ āĻ¸ā§āĻ°āĻā§āĻˇāĻž āĻāĻŦāĻ āĻĒā§āĻ°āĻāĻžāĻ° āĻāĻ°āĻžāĨ¤ āĻ¤āĻŋāĻ¨āĻŋ ā§§ā§¯ā§ā§Ž āĻĨā§āĻā§ ā§¨ā§Ļā§§ā§§ āĻ¸āĻžāĻ˛ āĻĒāĻ°ā§āĻ¯āĻ¨ā§āĻ¤ āĻŦāĻŋāĻāĻāĻĢāĻāĻ˛āĻāĻĢ āĻāĻ° āĻ
āĻ°ā§āĻĨ āĻ¸āĻŽā§āĻĒāĻžāĻĻāĻ āĻāĻŋāĻ˛ā§āĻ¨, āĻ¤āĻžāĻ°āĻĒāĻ° āĻ¸āĻžāĻ§āĻžāĻ°āĻŖ āĻ¸āĻŽā§āĻĒāĻžāĻĻāĻ āĻ¨āĻŋāĻ°ā§āĻŦāĻžāĻāĻŋāĻ¤ āĻšāĻ¨āĨ¤ ā§¨ā§Ļā§¨ā§¨ āĻ¸āĻžāĻ˛ āĻĒāĻ°ā§āĻ¯āĻ¨ā§āĻ¤ ā§§ā§§ āĻŦāĻāĻ° āĻ¸āĻžāĻ§āĻžāĻ°āĻŖ āĻ¸āĻŽā§āĻĒāĻžāĻĻāĻ āĻšāĻŋāĻ¸āĻžāĻŦā§ āĻĻāĻžā§āĻŋāĻ¤ā§āĻŦ āĻĒāĻžāĻ˛āĻ¨ āĻāĻ°āĻžāĻ° āĻĒāĻ°, āĻŽāĻāĻŋāĻĻ āĻāĻžāĻ āĻŦāĻŋāĻāĻāĻĢāĻāĻ˛āĻāĻĢ āĻāĻ° āĻ¸āĻāĻžāĻĒāĻ¤āĻŋ āĻ¨āĻŋāĻ°ā§āĻŦāĻžāĻāĻŋāĻ¤ āĻšāĻ¨āĨ¤ ā§§ā§Ŧ āĻ
āĻā§āĻā§āĻŦāĻ°, ā§¨ā§Ļā§¨ā§Š-āĻ āĻ¤āĻŋāĻ¨āĻŋ āĻŽāĻžāĻ°āĻž āĻ¯āĻžāĻā§āĻžāĻ° āĻāĻ āĻĒāĻ°ā§āĻ¯āĻ¨ā§āĻ¤ āĻ¤āĻŋāĻ¨āĻŋ āĻāĻ āĻĒāĻĻā§ āĻ
āĻ§āĻŋāĻˇā§āĻ āĻŋāĻ¤ āĻāĻŋāĻ˛ā§āĻ¨āĨ¤
āĻŽāĻāĻŋāĻĻ āĻāĻžāĻ āĻĻā§ā§āĻāĻžāĻŦā§ āĻā§āĻ°ā§āĻĄ āĻāĻāĻ¨āĻŋā§āĻ¨ā§āĻ° āĻ¸ā§āĻŦā§āĻā§āĻ¤āĻŋ āĻāĻŦāĻ āĻā§āĻˇāĻŋāĻ¤ā§ āĻ¨āĻŋā§ā§āĻāĻŋāĻ¤ āĻĒā§āĻ°āĻ¤ā§āĻ¯ā§āĻā§ āĻ¤āĻžāĻĻā§āĻ° āĻ¸āĻāĻāĻ āĻŋāĻ¤ āĻšāĻā§āĻžāĻ° āĻ¸ā§āĻŦāĻžāĻ§ā§āĻ¨āĻ¤āĻž āĻāĻŦāĻ āĻ¯ā§āĻĨ āĻĻāĻ°āĻāĻˇāĻžāĻāĻˇāĻŋāĻ° āĻ
āĻ§āĻŋāĻāĻžāĻ° āĻĒā§āĻ°ā§ā§āĻ āĻāĻ°āĻ¤ā§ āĻĒāĻžāĻ°ā§ āĻ¤āĻž āĻ¨āĻŋāĻļā§āĻāĻŋāĻ¤ āĻāĻ°āĻžāĻ° āĻāĻ¨ā§āĻ¯ āĻ˛ā§āĻžāĻ āĻāĻ°ā§āĻā§āĻ¨āĨ¤ āĻ¤āĻŋāĻ¨āĻŋ āĻā§āĻ°āĻŽāĻŦāĻ°ā§āĻ§āĻŽāĻžāĻ¨ āĻāĻ°ā§āĻĒā§āĻžāĻ°ā§āĻ āĻ¨āĻŋā§āĻ¨ā§āĻ¤ā§āĻ°āĻŖā§āĻ° āĻŽā§āĻā§ āĻāĻžāĻĻā§āĻ¯ āĻ¸āĻžāĻ°ā§āĻŦāĻā§āĻŽāĻ¤ā§āĻŦ āĻ°āĻā§āĻˇāĻžāĻ° āĻ˛ā§āĻžāĻā§ā§āĻ āĻ¨ā§āĻ¤ā§āĻ¤ā§āĻŦ āĻĻāĻŋā§ā§āĻāĻŋāĻ˛ā§āĻ¨āĨ¤ āĻŦāĻŋāĻļā§āĻˇ āĻāĻ°ā§, āĻŽāĻāĻŋāĻĻ āĻāĻžāĻ āĻā§āĻˇā§āĻĻā§āĻ° āĻ āĻĒā§āĻ°āĻžāĻ¨ā§āĻ¤āĻŋāĻ āĻā§āĻˇāĻāĻĻā§āĻ° āĻā§āĻŦāĻŋāĻāĻž āĻ¸ā§āĻ°āĻā§āĻˇāĻž āĻāĻŦāĻ āĻ¸ā§āĻĨāĻžāĻ¨ā§ā§ āĻ¸āĻŽā§āĻĒā§āĻ°āĻĻāĻžā§ā§āĻ° āĻāĻžāĻĻā§āĻ¯ āĻ¨āĻŋāĻ°āĻžāĻĒāĻ¤ā§āĻ¤āĻžāĻ° āĻāĻ¨ā§āĻ¯ āĻā§āĻ°ā§āĻ¤ā§āĻŦāĻĒā§āĻ°ā§āĻŖ āĻā§āĻˇā§āĻĻā§āĻ° āĻ āĻĒā§āĻ°āĻžāĻ¨ā§āĻ¤āĻŋāĻ āĻā§āĻˇāĻāĻĻā§āĻ° āĻŦā§āĻā§āĻ° āĻāĻĒāĻ° āĻ¨āĻŋā§āĻ¨ā§āĻ¤ā§āĻ°āĻŖāĻā§ āĻ
āĻā§āĻ°āĻžāĻ§āĻŋāĻāĻžāĻ° āĻĻāĻŋā§ā§āĻāĻŋāĻ˛ā§āĻ¨āĨ¤
āĻŽāĻāĻŋāĻĻ āĻāĻžāĻā§ā§āĻ° āĻ¨ā§āĻ¤ā§āĻ¤ā§āĻŦā§, āĻŦāĻŋāĻāĻāĻĢāĻāĻ˛āĻāĻĢ āĻā§āĻ¨ā§āĻāĻŋāĻāĻžāĻ˛āĻŋ āĻāĻā§āĻāĻŋāĻ¨āĻŋā§āĻžāĻ°āĻĄ (āĻāĻŋāĻāĻŽāĻ) āĻŦā§āĻā§āĻ° āĻŦāĻžāĻŖāĻŋāĻā§āĻ¯āĻŋāĻ āĻĒā§āĻ°āĻāĻ˛āĻ¨ā§āĻ° āĻŦāĻŋāĻ°ā§āĻ§āĻŋāĻ¤āĻžāĻ¸āĻš āĻā§āĻˇāĻŋāĻ° āĻāĻ°ā§āĻĒā§āĻžāĻ°ā§āĻ āĻ¨āĻŋā§āĻ¨ā§āĻ¤ā§āĻ°āĻŖā§āĻ° āĻŦāĻŋāĻ°ā§āĻĻā§āĻ§ā§ āĻ˛ā§āĻžāĻ āĻāĻ°ā§āĻā§āĻ¨āĨ¤ āĻ°āĻžāĻˇā§āĻā§āĻ°ā§ā§ āĻāĻžāĻŽāĻžāĻ° āĻāĻŦāĻ āĻāĻŦā§āĻˇāĻŖāĻž āĻā§āĻ¨ā§āĻĻā§āĻ°āĻā§āĻ˛āĻŋāĻ¤ā§ āĻŦāĻŋāĻāĻāĻĢāĻāĻ˛āĻāĻĢ āĻ¸āĻĻāĻ¸ā§āĻ¯āĻ°āĻž āĻāĻŋāĻāĻŽāĻ āĻĢāĻ¸āĻ˛ āĻĻā§āĻŦāĻžāĻ°āĻž āĻŦāĻžāĻāĻ˛āĻžāĻĻā§āĻļā§āĻ° āĻā§āĻŦāĻŋāĻ āĻĻā§āĻˇāĻŖ āĻŦāĻ¨ā§āĻ§ āĻāĻ°āĻ¤ā§ āĻāĻŦāĻ āĻāĻžāĻĻā§āĻ¯ āĻ āĻā§āĻˇāĻŋāĻ° āĻāĻĒāĻ° āĻāĻā§āĻ°āĻžāĻ¸ā§ āĻāĻ°ā§āĻĒā§āĻžāĻ°ā§āĻ āĻ¨āĻŋā§āĻ¨ā§āĻ¤ā§āĻ°āĻŖā§āĻ° āĻŽā§āĻā§ āĻāĻžāĻĻā§āĻ¯ āĻ¸āĻžāĻ°ā§āĻŦāĻā§āĻŽāĻ¤ā§āĻŦ āĻ°āĻā§āĻˇāĻžāĻ° āĻāĻ āĻĒā§āĻ°āĻā§āĻˇā§āĻāĻžā§ āĻā§āĻ°ā§āĻ¤ā§āĻŦāĻĒā§āĻ°ā§āĻŖ āĻā§āĻŽāĻŋāĻāĻž āĻĒāĻžāĻ˛āĻ¨ āĻāĻ°ā§āĻā§āĻ¨āĨ¤
āĻāĻļāĻŋā§āĻž-āĻĒā§āĻ¯āĻžāĻ¸āĻŋāĻĢāĻŋāĻ āĻ
āĻā§āĻāĻ˛ā§āĻ° āĻŦāĻŋāĻāĻāĻĢāĻāĻ˛āĻāĻĢ āĻšâāĻ˛ āĻāĻāĻāĻāĻāĻĢ āĻāĻ° āĻ
āĻ¨ā§āĻ¯āĻ¤āĻŽ āĻ¸āĻĻāĻ¸ā§āĻ¯ āĻāĻāĻ¨āĻŋā§āĻ¨ āĻ¯āĻžāĻ°āĻž āĻāĻ˛āĻŦāĻžā§ā§ āĻĒāĻ°āĻŋāĻŦāĻ°ā§āĻ¤āĻ¨ā§āĻ° āĻŦāĻŋāĻˇā§ā§ āĻ¸āĻā§āĻ¤āĻ¨āĻ¤āĻž āĻŦā§āĻĻā§āĻ§āĻŋ, āĻāĻ˛āĻŦāĻžā§ā§ āĻ¨ā§āĻ¯āĻžā§āĻŦāĻŋāĻāĻžāĻ°ā§āĻ° āĻ˛ā§āĻžāĻā§ā§ āĻā§āĻˇāĻ, āĻā§āĻˇāĻŋ āĻļā§āĻ°āĻŽāĻŋāĻ āĻāĻŦāĻ āĻ¤āĻžāĻĻā§āĻ° āĻ¸āĻŽā§āĻĒā§āĻ°āĻĻāĻžā§āĻā§ āĻ¸āĻāĻāĻ āĻŋāĻ¤ āĻ āĻ¸āĻā§āĻ°āĻŋā§ āĻāĻ°ā§āĻā§āĨ¤ āĻāĻāĻŋ āĻāĻāĻāĻāĻāĻĢ āĻāĻļāĻŋā§āĻž/āĻĒā§āĻ¯āĻžāĻ¸āĻŋāĻĢāĻŋāĻ āĻāĻā§āĻāĻ˛āĻŋāĻ āĻ¸āĻāĻāĻ āĻ¨ā§āĻ° āĻ¨ā§āĻ¤āĻŋ āĻ āĻāĻ°ā§āĻŽāĻ¸ā§āĻāĻŋāĻ° āĻāĻāĻāĻŋ āĻ
āĻŦāĻŋāĻā§āĻā§āĻĻā§āĻ¯ āĻ
āĻāĻļ āĻšā§ā§ āĻāĻ ā§āĻā§āĨ¤ āĻŦāĻ°ā§āĻ¤āĻŽāĻžāĻ¨ā§ āĻŦāĻŋāĻāĻāĻĢāĻāĻ˛āĻāĻĢ āĻāĻ˛āĻŦāĻžā§ā§ āĻ¸āĻāĻāĻā§āĻ° āĻŽā§āĻā§ āĻļā§āĻ°āĻŽāĻŋāĻāĻĻā§āĻ° āĻ
āĻ§āĻŋāĻāĻžāĻ°āĻā§ āĻāĻāĻŋā§ā§ āĻ¨āĻŋā§ā§ āĻ¯āĻžāĻā§āĻā§āĨ¤ āĻāĻ° āĻŽāĻ§ā§āĻ¯ā§ āĻ°ā§ā§āĻā§ āĻ¨ā§āĻ¯āĻžāĻ¯ā§āĻ¯ āĻŽāĻā§āĻ°āĻŋ āĻāĻŦāĻ āĻā§, āĻ¨āĻŋāĻ°āĻžāĻĒāĻĻ āĻāĻžāĻāĻ°āĻŋ, āĻ¨āĻŋāĻ°āĻžāĻĒāĻ¤ā§āĻ¤āĻž āĻ āĻ¸ā§āĻŦāĻžāĻ¸ā§āĻĨā§āĻ¯ āĻāĻŦāĻ āĻ¸āĻžāĻŽāĻžāĻāĻŋāĻ āĻ¸ā§āĻ°āĻā§āĻˇāĻžā§ āĻĒā§āĻ°āĻŦā§āĻļāĻžāĻ§āĻŋāĻāĻžāĻ°ā§āĻ° āĻāĻ¨ā§āĻ¯ āĻ¸āĻāĻā§āĻ°āĻžāĻŽāĨ¤
āĻāĻļāĻŋā§āĻž-āĻĒā§āĻ¯āĻžāĻ¸āĻŋāĻĢāĻŋāĻ āĻ
āĻā§āĻāĻ˛ā§āĻ° āĻāĻāĻāĻāĻāĻĢ-āĻāĻ° āĻ¸āĻĻāĻ¸ā§āĻ¯ āĻāĻāĻ¨āĻŋā§āĻ¨āĻ¸āĻŽā§āĻš āĻŦāĻŋāĻāĻāĻĢāĻāĻ˛āĻāĻĢ āĻ¸āĻĻāĻ¸ā§āĻ¯āĻĻā§āĻ° āĻāĻŦāĻ āĻŦāĻžāĻāĻ˛āĻžāĻĻā§āĻļā§āĻ° āĻ¸āĻāĻ˛ āĻāĻāĻāĻāĻāĻĢ āĻ¸āĻĻāĻ¸ā§āĻ¯āĻĻā§āĻ° āĻĒā§āĻ°āĻ¤āĻŋ āĻ¤āĻžāĻĻā§āĻ° āĻ¸āĻŽāĻŦā§āĻĻāĻ¨āĻž āĻ āĻ¸āĻāĻšāĻ¤āĻŋ āĻĒā§āĻ°āĻāĻžāĻļ āĻāĻ°ā§āĨ¤
by IUF Asia/Pacific | Sep 3, 2022 | Food Security, Human Rights, Land & Freedom, Secure Jobs, Social Justice
As a counter-summit to the official Tuna Congress in General Santos City in the Philippines, SENTRO held its 4th National Fishworkers Congress September 2-3, 2022. Hundreds of fisherfolks, commercial fishers and canning factory workers attending the Fishworkers Congress angrily denounced the new Voluntary Code of Good Practices signed by the SOCSKSARGEN Federation of Fishing and Allied Industries (SAFFAI) Tripartite Council during the official Tuna Festival.
âThe so-called Voluntary Code, is nothing but a PR exercise that SAFFAI is using to whitewash its horrendous record in wantonly violating the rights and welfare of its workersâ, said Herbert Demos, Regional Secretary of SENTRO SOCSARGEN.
âIts promises to uphold safely and health, provide education and skills upgrading, utilize alternative dispute mechanisms, respect labor standards and use retrenchments as a last resort will have no chance of being enforced so long as the industry continues to ignore workersâ right to freedom of association.â
The fraudulent Voluntary Code claims to be tripartite but has no legitimate labour representation. It is designed to avoid the legal obligations of DO-156
The Voluntary Code was signed without properly consulting the labor sector. The labor representatives who signed the document were members of the management and their allies.
SENTRO has long been criticizing SAFFAI for actively blocking the enforcement of Department Order No.156 Rules and Regulations governing the Working and Living Conditions of Fishers on board Fishing Vessels engaged in Commercial Fishing Operation which was issued in 2016.
â8 years after the issuance of DO-156, none of our commercial fishers have enjoyed its guarantee that they get at least the minimum wage on top of their rightful share of the catch and all the labor standards are respected.â
More importantly, workers in the canning factories and those onboard commercial fishing vessels have yet to access their full trade union rights. The extensive use of contractualization, the denial of employee-employer relations and the militant anti-union attitude of employers are the key factors preventing unionization.
âWe call on all those government representatives who signed the Voluntary Code to withdraw their imprimatur unless SAFFAI agrees to subject the same to meaningful consultation and takes into consideration the respect for workersâ constitutional right to self-organize, collectively bargain and to strike.â
by IUF Asia/Pacific | May 20, 2022 | child labour, Climate Crisis, Land & Freedom
Please read the Comment published in The Lancet Planetary Health online here.
by IUF Asia/Pacific | Nov 3, 2021 | child labour, Land & Freedom
The recent FAO report, Accelerating action to help to end child labour in agriculture in Asia, addresses a range of critical issues requiring coherent, multi-sectoral policy action. Among these actions is the need to reduce the risks associated with hazardous pesticides. The exposure of children to pesticides is one of several hazardous conditions in agricultural work. Hazardous work is a key determinant in defining child labour. Child labour refers to work that: is mentally, physically, socially or morally dangerous and harmful to children and interferes with their schooling.
As such, extreme hazards are associated with extreme forms of child labour. The Worst Forms of Child Labour Recommendation, 1999 (No. 190) refers in its definition of hazardous work to:
3. (d) work in an unhealthy environment which may, for example, expose children to hazardous substances, agents or processes, or to temperatures, noise levels, or vibrations damaging to their health;
Clearly toxic pesticides are among the hazardous substances that children are exposed to on farms and plantations. The ILO Code of Practice on safety and health in agriculture states that:
Children are considered to be at particularly high risk from pesticides. Their small size, rapid development, under-developed metabolism, diet and behaviour mean that smaller doses of toxins have a greater impact than in adults. Developmental effects can include disturbance of the nervous system, endocrine disruption and carcinogenity. Children can be exposed if they are present in the agricultural workplace, if their family members return home with pesticides on their clothing and skin, or if the family vehicle becomes contaminated. Special care must be taken to keep children away from pesticides, whether in concentrated or dilute form, and their containers, and to ensure that such chemicals are not brought into the home according to label recommendations.
It is in this context that an integrated approach to ending child labour in agriculture must incorporate both the reduction of pesticide use and the improved protection of the health and safety of agricultural workers. A key part of this approach is to ban the use of extremely hazardous pesticides such as paraquat and glyphosate (which cannot be used safely) and to reduce and restrict pesticide use according to the specific risks they pose to workers’ health and the environment.
In this regard the Safety and Health in Agriculture Convention, 2001 (No. 184) and the Code of Practice on safety and health in agriculture provide an important basis for policy and practice at national and local level. Yet in the Asia-Pacific region only one country – Fiji – has ratified Convention No.184. This must be urgently rectified. More governments in the Asia-Pacific region should ratify Convention No.184 as part of an integrated and more comprehensive strategy to end child labour in agriculture, as well ensuring that the agricultural work undertaken by adult workers that is so vital to rural development and food security is based on the right to safe, sustainable work.
The banning of extremely harmful pesticides such as paraquat and glyphosate and the effective protection of occupational safety, health and the environment (OSH&E) in agriculture are important preconditions for creating a safe environment for all agricultural workers. By reducing exposure to hazardous work, there is a possibility of safe, light work in agriculture that can be undertaken by children – as long as this work does not cause harm or interfere in children’s schooling. This of course must occur in a context where comprehensive policy action is taken to address the drivers of child labour.
Please read: eliminating child labour in agriculture needs guaranteed living wages, fair crop prices and freedom from debt – IUF Asia-Pacific
by IUF Asia/Pacific | Aug 27, 2021 | Food Security, Land & Freedom
In recent years we have seen growing public awareness of the social and environmental impact of food supply chains. Of course much greater awareness and action is needed, especially in terms of the appalling working conditions in agriculture and irreparable damage to human health and the environment. But there is no doubt that concern about the source of products in global food supply chains – how they are grown, processed, produced, packaged and transported – is increasing. This is combined with an expectation that these supply chains are guaranteed to be socially and environmentally sustainable. Those consumers who can afford it are willing to pay more for products that they believe do not cause environmental or social harm. These are deemed more sustainable or more ethical products.
Most concerns regarding environmental sustainability focus on deforestation, habitat destruction, endangered animal species, over-exploitation of scarce natural resources, pesticides, industrial waste, plastic pollution, and climate change. These environmental concerns intersect with health concerns. For example, there is a greater awareness of the link between consumer health, food safety and pesticide use.
While climate change is the major concern, there is also a greater interest in biodiversity loss. The Dasgupta Review in the UK, for example, could eventually have a far-reaching impact on international economic policy (including trade, aid and investment decisions). In the COVID-19 era there will be greater focus on how industrialized agriculture and habitat destruction contributes to the emergence of zoonoses like the SARS-CoV-2 coronavirus.
The main concerns regarding social sustainability focus on child labour, forced labour and trafficking (modern slavery), poverty wages, and rural livelihoods. The Modern Slavery Act [2015] in the UK has already had a far-reaching impact on UK-based companies, especially retailers and supermarkets. The Modern Slavery Act [2018] in Australia has had a similar impact. Similar laws and regulations are being introduced in the EU.
In several countries shareholders and financial institutions also require reporting on the environmental impact of a companyâs supply chains, especially in terms of climate change. To a lesser degree there is concern with compliance with new human rights instruments, particularly modern slavery and child labour. Of course much of this is driven by concerns with legal liability and business sustainability in terms of generating (or losing) future potential profits.
As more agri-food companies try to ensure compliance with new environmental and social standards in their supply chains and meet consumer expectations, they are turning to private sector auditing firms, accreditation bodies and international NGOs. Brands carrying certification or accreditation are seen as value-added and consumers are willing to pay a premium price.
However, the business of social and environmental auditing and accreditation by private firms and NGOs is costly. In many cases monitoring and verification by these organizations absorbs a significant part of the premium price â and this reduces the amount passed on to farmers in the form of fair prices or workers in terms of fair wages. This reduces the overall economic and social contribution to the country/province/region in general and the rural community in particular.
In several cases, third party monitoring by NGOs or auditing firms absorbs so much of the premium that small farmers lose any financial incentive to undertake socially and environmentally sustainable farming practices. On both farms and plantations safer, more sustainable work practices through reduced pesticide use may in fact increased costs. If this is not offset by premium prices, then it becomes economically unsustainable despite the potential benefits to health and the environment.
There is also a risk that NGOs and accreditation bodies develop a vested interest in these social and environmental problems continuing. They are paid or receive funding as long as they continue to expose problems, such as child labour. In this case, human rights or environmental issues may become leverage for more funding and to exert pressure on local governments. These organizations are then financed to devise and implement action plans externally, regardless of local government and trade union efforts in this regard.
Lacking any commitment to a particular country or region, these auditing firms and NGOs can easily shift their business to other countries, causing a shift in supply chains. Ultimately the business of auditing and certification leads to the privatization of labour and environmental standards. This changes the purpose of these standards and diminishes the role and responsibilities of governments. This is not only unsustainable, it could become detrimental to the future of local communities. A more effective and sustainable approach is to develop robust labour inspection systems under the appropriate local government authorities. Labour inspection in agriculture extends to both farms and plantations and covers a range of issues related to recruitment, employment and working conditions.
The scope of labour inspection in agriculture and its mechanics is defined in Labour Inspection (Agriculture) Convention, 1969 (No. 129) and Labour Inspection (Agriculture) Recommendation, 1969 (No. 133). The Safety and Health in Agriculture Convention, 2001 (No. 184) and Safety and Health in Agriculture Recommendation, 2001 (No. 192) are important standards that must be incorporated into these labour inspection systems.
While ratification of these conventions and recommendations by national governments is urgently needed, it is not a necessary precondition to the application of standards. These conventions and recommendations can be used as the recognized international standard applied when developing the new system labour inspection in agriculture. The practical implementation of these conventions and recommendations through an inspection mechanism at provincial/regional level will help to establish the integrity of the system. Education of farm and plantation workers about these standards is a vital part of this. This in turn ensures that compliance can actually be measured.
In this way, a resilient and proactive system of labour inspection in agriculture implemented at regional/provincial level would create the necessary infrastructure and mechanisms for compliance with global standards in supply chains. This will enhance the long-term economic viability of sourcing from this region/province. With a credible government labour inspection system in place, there is less need for private sector and third-party certification. As a result, more of the premium can be passed to small farmers and their communities and â through collective bargaining â achieve better wages (living wages) for agricultural and plantation workers.
An effective labour inspection system also means that an authority accountable to the public and not private companies can talk with workers about the reality of their working and living conditions. The credibility and integrity of independent private audits and certification is undermined by its very purpose: to prove there are no problems. Or if there are problems, then they can be resolved (managed) without affecting the economics of farms and plantations. Despite the role of piece-rate wages as a significant driver of child labour, for example, private auditing and certification bodies see it as untouchable because employers claim it will fundamentally affect productivity.
Public sector labour inspectors in an effective, well resourced system can restore the integrity of investigation and compliance as a responsibility of government to set and regulate standards and protect rights, health and the environment. Of course for workers to be able to speak to anyone about really happens on farms and plantations on a day to basis, they must have guaranteed access to the right to freedom of association under Right of Association (Agriculture) Convention, 1921 (No. 11).
It is no coincidence that the same plantations and farms that supply agri-food companies and readily participate in their privatized standard-setting and compliance mechanisms refuse access to labour inspectors. Not surprisingly the same employers absolutely refuse access to trade unions. If the supply chains are transparent and proven to be fair and sustainable, why is there so much legal action taken to prevent access by labour inspectors or unions?
Building an effective system labour inspection in agriculture requires capacity â institutional, budgetary and personnel. This means that the same agri-food companies that claim to commit to sustainability must pay corporate taxes and stop tax avoidance measures. The must also stop leveraging local governments for subsidies and tax holidays. Even if just some of the financial resources currently going into to the branding and promotion of food products as ethical through private sector certification is diverted to public resources, then there is a greater possibility to make these guarantees a reality.